• Aug 14, 2020

How your numerical score is interpreted

The way during which the numerical test score is interpreted is analogous besides of other aptitude tests (verbal and abstract). Your score is compared to a benchmark that has many others at an organizational level and in an occupation almost like the one you're applying for. As like, if you apply for a task in marketing and are given a numerical reasoning test to finish, your raw score (or the amount of correct responses) is then compared with an outsized number of many people that either add marketing roles or applied for roles in marketing. This permits employers
to find out how good your numerical reasoning skills are as compared to those of others within the area you applied for.

In the numerical reasoning test, there is no 'passing' score. Your numerical test result's calculated in similar roles people. This suggests that albeit you correctly answered most of the questions within the numerical reasoning test, your result should be less than that of people in similar roles. How is that this possible? Let’s check out the subsequent example: you correctly answered 24 of
30 questions. You interpret this to be a ‘good result’. However, people in similar roles thereto you applied for have also very strong numerical reasoning skills and on the average answer correctly 26 of 30 questions. This suggests that your ‘good result’ is really a ‘bad result’ because it’s less than the typical results of people that add an identical role thereto you applied for.